|
Introduction
There has been a renewed interest in the social and moral aspects
of schooling, both nationally and at a state level. The National
Goals for Schooling in the Twenty First Century sets out a framework
of national collaboration for the improvement of Australian schooling.
In terms of specific goals the declaration asserts that when students
leave school they should
Have qualities of self-confidence, optimism and high self-esteem
and a commitment to personal excellence as a basis for their potential
life role as family, community and workforce members.
Have the capacity to exercise judgement and responsibility
in matters of morality, ethics and social justice, the capacity
to make sense of their world, to think about how things got to
be the way they are, to make rational and informed decisions about
their own lives and accept responsibility for their own actions.
In Western Australia, the expectation that schools address the
Social Outcomes of Schooling has arisen from several broad sources:
- A growing pressure to look at more than just the academic outcomes
of schooling;
- The narrowness of existing reporting procedures;
- The outcomes of schooling which are made explicit in the Curriculum
Framework, the Outcomes and Standards Framework and the National
Goals of Schooling; and
- Community concerns

Background to the Assessments
In 1999 the Evaluation Unit in the then Standards and Effectiveness
Directorate was asked by its director to consider ways in which
a system-level contribution could assist schools to support, promote,
monitor and report the development of the social outcomes of schooling.
A group consisting of people from Education and Health who were
already working in the area of social outcomes was established,
resulting in the convening of a cross-sectorial Social Outcomes
Interest Group.
Definition
The following is offered as a broad definition of Social Outcomes
of Schooling:
- the benefits that are shared by society at large; and more
specifically
- school students' attitudes about themselves (self-confidence
and self-esteem), their optimism, respect for others, social competence,
awareness and appreciation of social conventions, motivation,
respect for learning and attitudes to lifelong learning.
Group Processes
The Social Outcomes Interest Group's approach to the designated
task was by consensus decision-making. At all stages of the process,
there was debate regarding the best way to move forward. This ensured
that the interests of all stakeholders were considered and incorporated
in the work undertaken at each stage.
Stage One - (A) Overview of Previous and Current Work
Initial meetings established that work already being done in the
area was complementary. The Students at Educational Risk
project aims to identify and assist students who are at risk of
not achieving desired outcomes, and with the Institute of Child
Health Research, a Social-Emotional Developmental Continuum
was developed to better identify the progression of students' development
in this area. In addition, the Clarkson Community Project
has been developing ways in which schools and the community can
best support each other to achieve desired outcomes. Monitoring
Standards in Education has undertaken studies in Health and
Physical Education and some work was undertaken in the Technology
and Enterprise and Society and Environment learning areas.
Stage One - (B) Establishing a Way Forward
As all schools are working with the Curriculum Framework, it was
decided that this document be the starting point for future work,
at the same time as recognising the value of, and the complementary
nature of, current work in relation to social outcomes of schooling.
Stage Two - The Place of Social Outcomes in the Curriculum Framework
The Curriculum Framework's Overarching Learning Outcomes were examined
to identify explicit and implicit Social Outcomes. These Social
Outcomes appeared to group around the spheres of
- Self
- Self with Other People
- Self with the Wider World
The following major clusters of Social Outcomes were defined to
reflect these spheres:
- Interpersonal Skills
- Autonomy, Independence and Enterprise
- Intrapersonal Skills (minor cluster with two aspects)
- Feelings in relation to self
- Self-management skills
- Emotional expression and regulation (minor cluster)
- Critical thinking/problem solving (minor cluster)
- Social, Moral and Ethical Development
Stage Three - Cluster Check
The Social Outcomes generated in Stage Two were mapped to the Social
Outcomes Clusters in order to judge how well the Outcomes were accommodated
by the clusters.
Stage Four - The Place of Social Outcomes in the Learning Area
Outcomes
The Learning Outcomes of each of the eight learning areas, as described
in the Curriculum Framework, were examined for explicit incorporation
of the Social Outcomes clusters. Senior Curriculum Officers took
a major role in this examination.
The clusters were found to be represented across all learning areas,
demonstrating that the social outcomes of the overarching learning
outcomes were consistent with the learning outcomes of each learning
area.
Stage Five - The Place of Social Outcomes in the Core Values
The five core values of the Curriculum Framework were examined
in the light of the Social Outcomes clusters. The clusters were
found to be consistent with the values, indicating coherence between
the Social Outcomes and the core values.
Conclusion
The Clusters of Social Outcomes were found to be consistent with
the key elements of the Curriculum Framework: the Overarching Learning
Outcomes, the Learning Area Outcomes and the Core Values. They thus
provided a way forward for a system-level contribution to the support,
promotion, monitoring and reporting of the development of social
outcomes of students in WA state schools.
An ongoing concern of the group was the danger of creating another
"framework". This concern arose because of the demands that an additional
framework may place on teachers who were already in the process
of coming to terms with the Curriculum Framework and the Outcomes
and Standards Framework. The concern also arose as core values and
Social Outcomes are already explicit in the Curriculum Framework
and Outcomes and Standards Frameworks and it was felt that another
"framework" might be a duplication of these. The process that the
group followed resulted in the clarification of what Social Outcomes
are made explicit, and where they are located, within the existing
frameworks. It appears that the development of an additional "Social
Outcomes" framework will not eventuate, due to the consistency with
which the Social Outcomes are represented within the frameworks.
The identification of the Social Outcomes within the Curriculum
Framework and the Outcomes and Standards Framework was seen as being
useful to schools in the implementation of the CIP in discrete learning
areas, in particular the articulation of the identified Social Outcomes
within the learning outcomes. This identification of the Social
Outcomes was also seen as potentially useful in emphasising the
cross-curricula nature of the Curriculum Framework.
The
Assessments
The Social Outcomes assessment is planned for two stages:
First Stage
The first stage of the assessment targeted the following two major
clusters:
- Social, moral and ethical development
- Interpersonal skills
Scenarios were developed which drew on aspects of the following:
- Empathy
- Social responsibility
- Social knowledge
- Principled behaviour
- Valuing difference
- Recognition of a dilemma
- Seeing things from a different perspective
- Human rights
Second Stage
The second stage of the assessment targeted the cluster
- Autonomy, Independence and Enterprise
Final Stage
The last stage of testing
targeted both Interpersonal and Intrapersonal skills.

General Information
The MSE Social
Outcomes Materials consist of 2 tests for students in each of the
years 3, 7 and 10. Students need to complete both test booklets for
each specified year level. It is recommended that each test be
administered in two separate sessions.
The Outcomes in
the Social Outcomes of Schooling, whilst not comprising a distinct and
separate learning area, are implicit in all eight learning areas, and
are reflected and articulated in the Overarching Learning Outcomes and
Core Shared Values of the Curriculum Framework.
The key aspects of
students' social, moral and ethical development from Year 3 to Year 10
are:
-
Principled behaviour:
the reasoning behind the way [people act, comprising valuing
difference, social responsibility and human rights. It is drawn
from the Decision-Making strand of the Health and
Physical Education learning area; the Acting Responsibly
strand of the Science learning area; and from all the Technology
and Enterprise strands.
-
Empathy:
incorporating recognition of different points of view, and an
awareness of other people's emotional states. Empathy is
explicitly mentioned in the Decision Making and
Interpersonal Skills strands of Health and Physical
Education, and the Place and Space strand of Society and
Environment. It is implicit in most of the other Society and
Environment strands.
-
Perspective:
ranging across the social domains from self, through community,
to society and the world. This aspect of respecting and valuing
others is present in all of the Western Australian Outcome
Statements.
The Respecting
and Valuing Others School release material incorporates these five
aspects of students' social, moral and ethical development.

The Assessment
|
Year Level |
Test Booklet |
No. of Questions |
Time Allocation |
Materials Required (include Teacher Manual for each test) |
|
3 * |
A1 (Blue) |
5 |
35 minutes |
1 written
test/student |
|
3 * |
A2 (Blue) |
5 |
35 minutes |
1 written
test/student |
|
7 ** |
B1 (Buff) |
9 |
35 minutes |
1 written
test/student |
|
7 ** |
B2 (Buff) |
9 |
35 minutes |
1 written
test/student |
|
10 |
C1 (Gold) |
9 |
35 minutes |
1 written
test/student |
|
10 |
C2 (Gold) |
10 |
35 minutes |
1 written
test/student |
* At
year 3 the teacher should read each scenario and question to the
class. The teacher should add on an appropriate amount
of time to accommodate this.
** At year 7
the teacher may choose to read all or some of the scenarios and
questions to the class. An appropriate amount of time should be
added on to accommodate this.

Costs
The MSE assessment materials are intended for school
use only. They are provided as a service, free of charge, to WA
Government schools. Costs, including postage costs, for educational
institutions other than Western Australian government schools
will be applied.
The costs of the Social Outcomes Assessment
Materials are as follows:
Invoices will be sent under separate cover. WA Government schools
will NOT be invoiced.
For WA Government schools, there is a limit of one
Teachers Manual per school. Additional manuals will be charged as per the rate for non-government
institutions. Student answer booklets are supplied on a needs
basis. Repeat orders of student booklets are not charged.
All assessment material is the property of schools.
Teachers and administrators should ensure that it is kept in a
safe place for future assessments.

Ordering Assessment Materials
To order Assessment Materials click
Ordering Assessment Materials

|