|
Welcome to the Leadership Section of the
GDEO website
The vital role of leadership with Goldfields’
schools:
During the past decade, a growing
body of evidence has demonstrated the impact of leadership on student
achievement. School leaders assume a myriad of responsibilities
that are important in running a school, but many of these duties
are not essential to improving student achievement. For example,
such issues as maintenance, finance, are important, but not necessarily
essential in terms of improving student achievement. In an era of
accountability when student achievement is paramount, and evidence
of the effects of leadership on student achievement continue to
accumulate, it is not enough to just know what it important; principals
must also know what is essential. Leaders and leadership is critical
to school and student improvement. School leaders are in direct
contact with the school’s teachers, the very people who can
make a difference to what students learn and achieve in our schools.
The change agents
As Professor Richard Elmore states
–
“Reading the literature
on the principalship can be overwhelming, because it suggests that
principals should embody all the traits and skills that remedy all
the defects of the schools in which they work.
They should be in close touch
with their communities, inside and outside the school; they should,
above all, be masters of human relations, attending to all the conflicts
and disagreements that might arise among students, among teachers,
and among anyone else who chooses to create conflict in the school;
they should be both respectful of the authority of district administrators
and crafty at deflecting administrative intrusions that disrupt
the autonomy of teachers; they should keep an orderly school; and
so on.
Somewhere on the list one usually
finds a reference to instruction, couched in strategically vague
language, so as to include both those who are genuinely knowledgeable
about and interested in instruction and those who regard it as a
distraction from the main work of administration. But why not focus
leadership on instructional improvement, and define everything else
as instrumental to it?
[The only] skills and knowledge
that matter in leadership are those that can be connected to, or
lead directly to, the improvement of instruction and student performance.”
- (page 14) Building A New Structure
For School Leadership (2000)
Put
simply:
If we want to improve the standing of Goldfields’
schools in the eyes of the community, we must improve the
quality of student achievement within our school.
|
 |
|